One of the great joys, and most under-rated features, of the iPhone when it first launched was the ability to update its operating systems and firmware via iTunes. If, like me, you had bought one or more mobile â€˜lemonsâ€™ over the years, that had to be returned to a â€˜service centreâ€™ for reprogramming, youâ€™ll know exactly what I mean.
Despite the iTunes umbilical cord, it meant that an iPhone owner could always choose to have the latest and greatest, for at least two generations of a model. The concept was so good that other manufacturers soon caught on, including Googleâ€™s Androids and Windows Mobile 7. Now mobile devices can always be kept up to date – or can they?
Just like PCs before them, it appears not all mobile devices are created equal. An operating system is a continual â€˜work in progressâ€™ and when you only have one form factor to worry about, as in the case of the iPhone, releasing stress-free updates is doable. However, when your OS is adopted by numerous manufacturers producing multiple device types with different screen sizes, processors, inputs, cameras, interfaces, etc. The task of keeping everyone updated becomes slightly more difficult. In the case of Android, there are at least four or five versions in the field and not all handsets can be updated.
If the phone makers like to tinker with some of the OS features then, as in the case of the recent Samsung WP7 updates, the device can quickly become an ornamental brick. When things do go wrong, itâ€™s the network operator that usually gets the first call, not because they probably supplied the device, more because they actually have someone answering their customer service lines.
The smarter phones get the more they emulate our PCs and the more likely we are to become frustrated with and fearful of any software updates, especially those marked as security updates. These updates usually follow some sort of breach of security, or malware attack, not precede them.
In the case of Android theÂ most recent update was designed to undo any damage caused by a wave of malware-infected applications discovered last week.Â Fierce Mobile Content reports that, â€œmore than 50 Android appsâ€”credited to developers Kingmall2010, we20090202 andÂ Myournetâ€”reportedly contained the DroidDream malware, which seeks to gain root access to the userâ€™s device, collecting a range of available data and downloading more malicious code to the smartphone without the consumerâ€™s knowledge or consent. Thatâ€™s right, 50 bad apps sold directly from the Android Market.
â€œGoogle plans to implement a series of new security measures to prevent other Android Market applications from wreaking the same kind of havoc. The digital services giant is also collaborating with partners to solve the storefrontâ€™s underlying security questions.â€
Alas, thatâ€™s only half the story. It seems that Google had another little weapon, kept pretty much to itself, in case of such emergency. Dubbed the â€˜App Kill Switch,’ Google confirmed it recently activated Android Market’s remote application removal tool to wipe all installed copies of the offending malware on customer devices.
Wow, thatâ€™s impressive, but letâ€™s get this into some perspective. If I had an Android device and I happened to have installed the said malware applications, Google, without me knowing it, would have accessed my device andÂ zapped something on it without my knowing it. Hmm, if somebody was able to do that on my PC I would probably have been calling a lawyer!
I would prefer that the apps did not make into the Android Market in the first place. However, itâ€™s nice to know â€˜Big Gâ€™ is looking out for malware, even after it has been distributed, itâ€™s quite another finding they have the ability to nuke something on my phone.
Oh no, I feel another case of ‘mobile paranoiaâ€™ coming on!